Tripoli, 8 January:
Mahmoud Jibril’s National Forces Alliance – with 39 party seats the
largest block within the 200-member General National Congress – has
withdrawn from the assembly, in protest over “poor performance” and
“unacceptable practices” in Libya’s first elected legislative body.
The withdrawal was announced on Sunday. In a statement, the NFA
declared:. “The Libyan people put their faith in our hands, and if we
are not able to perform accordingly, we need to turn down the
responsibility, lest we be considered oppressors. We needed to adopt
this position in order to single out some of the shortcomings and we ask
people to show their solidarity with us”.
The declaration then listed its issues with the Congress and its
president, Mohammed Magarief. These included excessive delays in
establishing the Constituent Assembly that will draft the Constitution
and unilateral decisions by the presidency, without consulting GNC
members, thereby hindering Congress from carrying out its core
functions.
The NFA also condemned what it described as the president’s inaction
in the face of security threats and violent disturbances of GNC
sessions. It also cited what it believed is a lack of standard
procedures and rules to steer Congress meetings.
The harshness of the accusations seems to point to rising tensions within the parliament.
At a press conference on Monday, party members returned to the
stalled decision on the Constituent Assembly, which they said had been
repeatedly pushed back, far beyond the extension period provided for in
the 2011 constitutional declaration.
The party representatives also emphasised the difficult working
conditions for parliamentarians, given that GNC sessions have been
disrupted by violent protests on numerous occasions.
The official head of the NFA in Congress, Ibrahim Al-Ghariani, said
it was a temporary withdrawal until demands were met, according to AFP.
Reactions to the withdrawal have been mixed, with many Libyans calling the decision “irresponsible” and “counterproductive”.
“Resignation is the language of those who have lost everything”, wrote one commentator on The Libyan Nation website.
“We elected you to form a political resistance, not so that you would
resign at the first occasion!”, commented another on the official NFA
Facebook page.
The withdrawal has also sparked lively debates on Twitter, where the
NFA appears to have numerous supporters, who are nevertheless
disappointed at the party’s decision.
Many point out that, regardless of problems within the GNC,
boycotting it does not serve the interest of the nation and its people
any better.
Others have sided with the NFA, congratulating the party for its
decisive stance against unjustified meddling in Congress affairs by
president Magarief and also for putting the constitutional issue back
on the agenda.
Some also see the withdrawal as a welcome step to marginalise
influential figures, such as the party leader Jibril, who held senior
positions within the Qaddafi regime.
Looked at this way, the NFA through its decision may have played into
the hands of its adversaries. Equally it may be an attempt to distract
attention from accusations against some of its members.
However, most people seem to agree that the withdrawal mainly
reflects pent-up frustrations among NFA delegates, at the GNC’s slow and
tedious decision-making process, coupled with their loss of leverage,
in comparison to other political forces, that have gained influence
since Congress was elected.
