Fatima Doubakil, one of the initiator’s of the “hijab outcry” campaign,
speaks to the media outside the government building in Stockholm on
August 20, 2013, after a meeting with the minister of justice following
an attack of a woman wearing a veil last Saturday. — Reuters
STOCKHOLM — In gender-equality Sweden, a grassroots
movement defending women’s right to wear hijab has split the nation,
backed by politicians and celebrities while critics say it supports a
symbol of female “oppression.”
Hundreds of Swedish women have posted photographs of themselves wearing
headscarves on social media sites to show solidarity with a heavily
pregnant Muslim woman who says she was attacked outside Stockholm for
wearing a veil.
Police are searching for witnesses to the incident, which is being
treated as a hate crime, and has sparked a wave of online protest.
Leftist politicians and celebrities were among those who lent their
support to the movement, dubbed “The hijab appeal,” by tweeting pictures
of themselves wearing the Islamic headscarf.
By Thursday, more than 2,000 people had posted pictures tagged with the
“hijab appeal” hashtag on Instagram, mostly featuring women of different
faiths wearing the veil.
A Facebook “event” page set up by the activists garnered 10,000
attendees but had to be removed after the comments section was swamped
with racist and sexist remarks.
“The number of hate crimes against Muslim women has increased lately,” one of the campaign organizers, Foujan Rouzbeh, told AFP.
However, critics say the campaign trivializes the suffering of women
forced or pressured into covering their heads, in Sweden and elsewhere.
“I support protesting against the treatment of the woman who was
attacked, absolutely. Holding speeches, demonstrating,” said Sara
Mohammad, the head of a charity for victims of honor crimes.
The Swedish politicians wearing the hijab this week rarely displayed the
same support for those fighting for the right not to wear it, sometimes
risking their lives in doing so, Mohammad argued.
“This is an injudicious and populist measure designed to attract votes from the Muslim community,” she said.
Rouzbeh said critics of the Swedish hijab campaign had taken it out of context.
“We’re not trying to belittle people’s experience of having been forced
to wear the veil ...we’re basing this on veiled women who wear it out of
choice. Those women should have the right to do that without being
attacked,” she said.
Muslim women were being used as scapegoats in the face of rising
unemployment in Sweden and the rest of Europe, said Rouzbeh, who met the
justice minister on Wednesday.
“None of us are saying this started under the current government, but we
would argue that it has increased because they haven’t taken this
threat seriously.”
The group is demanding a commission be set up to investigate the problem
of violence against veiled women, and also wants the government to
ensure a ban on newsreaders for public broadcaster SVT wearing the
garment is lifted.
Rouzbeh said the rise of the anti-immigrant Sweden Democrats, which the
latest polls indicate would be the third largest party in an election,
and a negative image of Muslims in the media had stoked violence and
harassment of women wearing the hijab.
But there is little data to support claims of a surge in the number of Islamophobic hate crimes.
The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention said 306 such crimes
were reported last year, compared with 278 the previous year and 272 in
2008.
Social anthropologist Aje Carlbom of Malmoe University said Swedish
attitudes toward the hijab were largely positive, unlike toward the
full-face niqab sometimes worn by Muslim women.
He said he was not aware of any rise in the number of people who opposed it.
“Ever since we began having immigration from the Muslim world, it’s been
claimed that (dislike of the veil) is increasing, that it’s widespread,
and so on,” he said. “I don’t know why this is happening right now.” —
AFP