The authorities in Libya need to step away from the political rhetoric,
which is based on political and ideological conflicts and struggle for
power, and instead assess the situation realistically, and identify the
root causes for deteriorating security situation in southern Libya in
particular, argues Mohamed Eljarh.
The Libyan authorities have recently announced the south
of Libya a military zone and appointed a military commander with certain
executive and security powers to tackle the deteriorating security
situation in the region.
However, the Libyan
authorities failed to explain the situation to the public clearly and
have opted instead for political rhetoric that historical tribal and
ethnic tensions erupted after the fall of the Gaddafi regime and that
foreign agendas and Gaddafi loyalists in neighbouring countries have
fuelled these tensions. The Libyan media has also failed to address the
issue in southern Libya and lacked any real professionalism to report to
the public and the world what the unfolding situation in southern Libya
is like in reality.
The authorities in Libya have
failed to present the public and the media in Libya with any real
progress reports with facts and figures about the numbers of units and
personnel deployed, and such ambiguity suggests the lack of any real
comprehensive vision or strategy to tackle the dangerous situation in
Southern Libya. Moreover, southern Libya is bordered by African
countries that are suffering from political and economic upheavals.
In
addition, there is growing fear of the significant and growing active
role AL Qaeda is playing in southern Libya especially in the areas
bordering Algeria and Niger. International and domestic reports have
highlighted the growing danger of Jihadi networks, which have reportedly
established at least three training camps for recruits from
neighbouring countries. These fears and concerns have been confirmed
recently by the attack on the gas complex in In Amenas, which the
Algerian authorities and other intelligence reports have linked directly
to southern Libya. Despite these reports, the Libyan authorities have
repeatedly distanced Libya from the attack in In Amenas. Furthermore,
arms scattered all over Libya have now fallen into the hands of the
Jihadi networks in North Africa and the Sahel region.
The
unrest in Mali was worsened by the flow of arms from Libya into the
hands of Islamist militants. The events have led to French led
interventions to drive the Islamists out of Mali and regain control of
the region. Many see this French led campaign as a revival of the
historical colonial role of France in the region which started in Libya
during the NATO campaign to protect civilians.
Despite
the Algerian opposition to the military campaign in Mali, the Algerian
authorities allowed France to use its airspace for the military campaign
against the Islamists in Mali. Libya too openly opposed any Military
actions in Mali; however, reports suggest that Libyan officials have
expressed their support for the French led military campaign. If Libya’s
position were confirmed to be so, the Libyan Tuareg and Amazigh in the
southwest would consider this position as a campaign against their
rights in establishing a nation for the Tuareg population in the region.
Such position could exacerbate tensions in southern Libya and widen the
gap of distrust in the new Libyan authorities’ commitment to the rights
of the ethnic minorities ahead of the constitution writing process.
Reports
in the US media have highlighted increased interest and desire by
officials in Washington DC to establish American Military presence in
southern Libya to tackle the growing presence and activities of Al Qaeda
in the North Africa and the Sahel region. These reports were followed
by a statement by the UN mission in Libya that despite the efforts
exerted by Libya to control its southern borders and establish law and
order in the region, that the authorities lack the resources and vision
to make any real progress in that direction.
There is
currently clear lack of co-ordination of efforts and resources to
restore order in southern Libya. However, Libya’s new Ministers of
Interior and Defence have designed a comprehensive plan to restore
control over Libya’s borders and the wider security situation, and the
results for these plans are yet to materialize into any meaningful
results on the ground. The co-operative plans promised visible changes
in the security situation in Libya within six months, and it has only
been two months until now.
The UN and EU missions in
Libya have offered to support the Libyan authorities with expertise on
the issue of border security in the southern region and advise on how to
tackle the issue of illegal immigration and smuggling of drugs and
weapons. The UN mission in Libya spent a whole week in facts finding
mission southern Libya in November 2011, and assessed the demographic
changes developing due to the huge influx of illegal immigration from
neighbouring countries.
The authorities in Libya need
to step away from the political rhetoric, which is based on political
and ideological conflicts and struggle for power, and instead assess the
situation realistically, and identify the root causes for deteriorating
security situation in southern Libya in particular. The security
situation in southern Libya requires real initiatives to tackle the
wider socio-economic and development issues.
Successive
governments during and after the revolution in Libya have recklessly
identified and contained Libya’s security problem in the revolutionary
militias and their hostile position towards all former police and army
personnel. Although this characterisation is true to some extent, but it
only reveals a small part of the whole picture. Therefore, any security
plans as comprehensive as they might be, if they fail to look at the
whole picture and address all the root causes of the problem, then these
plans would fail to restore security and establish control and would
only further complicate the situation. The Libyan authorities have to
openly acknowledge and incorporate the external threat posed by ethnic
and Jihadi groups in any strategic and immediate plans to restore
security in the south.
Finally, the Libyan government
is required to be more open and transparent about the security situation
and ask for international help through clear and mutual agreements,
instead of engaging into politically enthusiastic rhetoric about the
sovereignty of Libya. As international powers such as the United States
and France could act unilaterally if activities or groups in southern
Libya threaten its own national security.
middle-east-online.
middle-east-online.
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق